Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment> ?o ?g. }
- assertion comment "Observation of adult stage in sugarcane fields in a tropical agricultural Ribeirão Preto, Brazil. 2023-08-10T22:17:11Z" assertion.
- CSO-ICRP comment "The CSO is complemented by a standard cancer type coding scheme. Together, these tools lay a framework to improve coordination among research organizations, making it possible to compare and contrast the research portfolios of public, non-profit, and governmental research agencies" assertion.
- CSO-ICRP comment "The CSO is complemented by a standard cancer type coding scheme. Together, these tools lay a framework to improve coordination among research organizations, making it possible to compare and contrast the research portfolios of public, non-profit, and governmental research agencies" assertion.
- SusDat comment "NORMAN SusDat merges the many chemical lists on the SLE into a common format and includes all data suitable for screening purposes, along with selected identifiers and predicted values as a service for NORMAN members and beyond" assertion.
- SLE-MS comment "The NORMAN Suspect List Exchange (NORMAN-SLE) was established in 2015 as a central access point for NORMAN members (and others) to find suspect lists relevant for their environmental monitoring questions." assertion.
- SLE-MPP comment "The NORMAN-SLE documents all individual collections that form a part of the merged collection NORMAN SusDat. NORMAN-SLE versions are tracked on Zenodo. " assertion.
- RCX comment "RECETOX is engaged in research and education on managing the environmental and health risks associated with the chemicals around us" assertion.
- RCX-GEN comment "GENASIS (Global ENvironmental ASsessment Information System) provides a comprehensive information on contamination of the environment by chemicals, namely persistent organic pollutans (POPs)." assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- assertion comment "this is a tweet that references two other tweets! https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1795069204418175459 --- I see that it only caught the second link as the quote tweet, but didn't include this as a quote tweet: https://x.com/sense_nets_bot/status/1798782358201508331 --- more quote tweets in this thread https://x.com/rtk254/status/1798549107507974626" assertion.
- GEN-OT comment "Data templates for air, water, sediment, soil, atmospheric deposition, and plants." assertion.
- GEN-DV comment "GENASIS Data Visualization is a tool for visualisation and interpretation of the validated and harmonized data coming from the environment stored in the GENASIS Database." assertion.
- FAIRsharing.41b655 comment "The Ringgold ID is a Persistent Identifier (PID) that assigns a unique numerical identifier to organizations for use across the scholarly communications sector. Ringgold assigns each organization an Identify Database record ID, and includes organizations which are part of the scholarly ecosystem – licensees, publishers, intermediaries, and funders – as well as those which license and create scholarly content – universities, hospitals, corporations, and government entities. Ringgold is a part of the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC) and contains 600,000+ records encompassing publishers, funders, research organizations, universities, intermediaries, and more." assertion.
- RinggoldIdentifyDB comment "A curated database of over 600,000 organization records with rich hierarchies and over 30 descriptive metadata elements." assertion.
- pbpko comment "Ontology for PBPK modeling in the life sciences domain is a structured framework that defines the concepts, relationships, and terms pertinent to PBPK modeling. PBPK modeling is a method used to predict the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) of chemical compounds in the human body. It is a key component in the study of pharmacokinetics, which is the branch of pharmacology dedicated to determining the fate of substances administered to a living organism." assertion.
- QPRF comment "The QSAR Prediction Reporting Format (QPRF) is a harmonised template for summarizing and reporting substance-specific predictions generated by (Q)SAR models. The information is structured according to the OECD template (v.2.0)." assertion.
- FAIRDataStation comment "The FAIR Data Station is a metadata ingestion platform that helps to improve the quality of metadata. The station allows users to record meta-data according to minimum information standards thereby ensuring FAIR scientific data management from the start." assertion.
- FAIRDataStation comment "The FAIR Data Station is a metadata ingestion platform that helps to improve the quality of metadata. The station allows users to record meta-data according to minimum information standards thereby ensuring FAIR scientific data management from the start." assertion.
- ROHub comment "Research object management platform supporting the preservation and lifecycle management of scientific investigations, research campaigns and operational processes." assertion.
- assertion comment "I do like https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "I do like https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "Love this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01717-x" assertion.
- assertion comment "saw this? https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01720-2" assertion.
- assertion comment "amazing https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01508-4" assertion.
- assertion comment "Fake news https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01716-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "You should check this https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01732-y" assertion.
- assertion comment "I like https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-024-01711-3" assertion.
- assertion comment "Testing our new app on this great new paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04607" assertion.
- assertion comment "Testing our new app on this great new paper https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04607" assertion.
- assertion comment "Testing our new app on this great new paper as well https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.04607" assertion.
- TCP-IP comment "The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP). Early versions of this networking model were known as the Department of Defense (DoD) model because the research and development were funded by the United States Department of Defense through DARPA. The Internet protocol suite provides end-to-end data communication specifying how data should be packetized, addressed, transmitted, routed, and received. This functionality is organized into four abstraction layers, which classify all related protocols according to each protocol's scope of networking. An implementation of the layers for a particular application forms a protocol stack. From lowest to highest, the layers are the link layer, containing communication methods for data that remains within a single network segment (link); the internet layer, providing internet working between independent networks; the transport layer, handling host-to-host communication; and the application layer, providing process-to-process data exchange for applications." assertion.
- TCP-IP comment "The Internet protocol suite, commonly known as TCP/IP, is a framework for organizing the set of communication protocols used in the Internet and similar computer networks according to functional criteria. The foundational protocols in the suite are the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP), the User Datagram Protocol (UDP), and the Internet Protocol (IP). Early versions of this networking model were known as the Department of Defense (DoD) model because the research and development were funded by the United States Department of Defense through DARPA. The Internet protocol suite provides end-to-end data communication specifying how data should be packetized, addressed, transmitted, routed, and received. This functionality is organized into four abstraction layers, which classify all related protocols according to each protocol's scope of networking. An implementation of the layers for a particular application forms a protocol stack. From lowest to highest, the layers are the link layer, containing communication methods for data that remains within a single network segment (link); the internet layer, providing internet working between independent networks; the transport layer, handling host-to-host communication; and the application layer, providing process-to-process data exchange for applications." assertion.
- assertion comment "here's another good paper https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.007" assertion.
- assertion comment "Can we create this future please? "Collective Intelligence as a great scientific, technical, and political project that aims to 'make people smarter with computers, instead of trying to make computers smarter than people'" https://twitter.com/rtk254/status/1801242388209217973/photo/1 --- source - https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-58191-5_2 --- This is also cool.. I think I need to read more of Pierre Levy's works https://twitter.com/rtk254/status/1801242912736309401/photo/1" assertion.
- MP3 comment "Open standard lossy compression format for digital audio." assertion.
- WAV comment "File format standard for storing audio on PCs." assertion.
- TGN comment "The Getty Thesaurus of Geographic Names ® (TGN), the Art & Architecture Thesaurus ® (AAT), the Union List of Artist Names ® (ULAN), the Cultural Objects Name Authority ® (CONA), and the Iconography Authority ™ (IA) are structured resources that can be used to improve access to information about art, architecture, and material culture. They are not simple 'value vocabularies,' but unique, rich knowledge bases in themselves. Through rich metadata and links, the Getty Vocabularies provide powerful conduits for knowledge creation, research, and discovery for digital art history and related disciplines." assertion.
- NTA comment "identifier for person names (not: works nor organisations) from the Dutch National Thesaurus for Author names (which also contains non-authors)" assertion.
- BCL comment "De Nederlandse basisclassificatie (NBC) is een van oorsprong Nederlands bibliotheek classificatie-schema speciaal ontwikkeld voor wetenschappelijke bibliotheken. Deze classificatie is eind jaren tachtig van de twintigste eeuw ontwikkeld onder leiding van de Koninklijke Bibliotheek (Nederland), in gebruik sinds 1990 en wordt sindsdien bijgewerkt. https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nederlandse_Basisclassificatie" assertion.
- AST comment "A structured vocabulary of more than 13000 English terms in the field of African studies, the African Studies Thesaurus is developed and maintained by staff at the library of the African Studies Centre Leiden (ASCL). It is used for indexing and retrieving material in the library collection and is directly linked to the catalogue." assertion.
- nanopubs-way-to-create-even-more-silos.html comment "Hi Roderic, Great to see that you decided to look into nanopublications and get to the bottom of it. Let me respond to some of the points you raised and clarify a few misunderstandings and inaccuracies. > Nanopubs, a way to create even more silos The title is highly misleading in my view. You can use any kind of URI-based identifiers in nanopublications, so any silo-ness on the conceptual level is user-generated and not a shortcoming of the nanopublication technology. And on the data storage level, nanopublications are born in the global decentralized nanopublication network and never live in just one location, so they are as anti-silo as you can be in that respect. The nanopublication you mention can be found at all these places: - https://server.np.trustyuri.net/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - http://130.60.24.146:7880/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - https://server.np.dumontierlab.com/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - http://rdf.disgenet.org/nanopub-server/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig - https://np.knowledgepixels.com/RAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig And you can query it at all these places (and more): - https://query.np.trustyuri.net/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql-results%2Bjson&endpoint=%2Frepo%2Ffull&requestMethod=POST&tabTitle=Query&headers=%7B%7D&outputFormat=table - https://nanopub.sdsc.edu/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql-results%2Bjson&endpoint=%2Frepo%2Ffull&requestMethod=POST&tabTitle=Query&headers=%7B%7D&outputFormat=table - https://query.np.kpxl.org/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql - https://query.knowledgepixels.com/tools/full/yasgui.html#query=SELECT+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+WHERE+%7B+GRAPH+%3Chttps%3A%2F%2Fw3id.org%2Fnp%2FRAXCvEZfCcjYuH5DWOIujBehGQt61y_nRHWssw9u6aYig%23assertion%3E+%7B+%3Fs+%3Fp+%3Fo+%7D+%7D+&contentTypeConstruct=text%2Fturtle&contentTypeSelect=application%2Fsparql Can you point me to any technology that is *less* silo than this? > there are reasons not to be optimistic about nanopubs (or text-mining in general) Nanopublications are *not* a special case of text mining. In fact, they were conceived to make sure we don't need text mining in the first place ("Why bury it first and then mine it again?"; see https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-6-142 ). > In other words, > [Helictopleurus dorbignyi] -> [isSynonymOf] -> [Helictopleurus halffteri] > This seems a fairly simple thing to say, ... Yes, it always looks simple until you dig into the details, and then it gets more complicated. This modeling was the result form extended discussions with people at Pensoft and other biodiversity experts. I might not be using the right domain terms here, but as you know, taxons have names and these names have URI-based identifiers even, but these names have often been used in different ways. So, the same names (even with identifiers) can refer to different taxon *concepts*. For these concepts, there aren't universally available and acceptable identifiers yet, unfortunately. But they can be constructed form a taxon name and a reference to a publication or "treatment" where this interpretation is explained. There are others who can explain better the domain side of this reasoning, which you can probably piece together from your own expertise in the domain, but that was how we arrived at this semantic model. > indeed we could say it with a single triple, but the corresponding nanopub requires 33 RDF triples to say this. 33 doesn't seem like a very large number to me. And I can explain in detail the purpose of every single one of these triples. Provenance and metadata are important, and they need a bit of space, that's all. > By itself this isn’t terribly useful because neither of the two taxa are “things” that have identifiers, they are blank nodes. Yes, but that's a result of the modeling decision above. Nanopublications as a technology don't force you to do it this way. > cannot have interoperability unless you use the same identifiers for the same things No, that's not true. We should indeed *minimize* the use of different identifiers for the same thing, but we can very well achieve interoperability with multiple identifiers. Approaches like linksets and scientific lenses, among others, can do this. We are working on concrete solutions for this within the nanopublication ecosystem too. On an open and distributed system like the Web, it's in fact *impossible* to enforce unique identifiers for the same things. You cannot prevent different people defining different identifiers for the same thing at different ends of the Web, and it has actually happened many many times, so we have to deal with this whether we want to or not. > That means persistent identifiers, identifiers that you have some confidence will be around in ten, 20, or 50 years (at least). That's a completely separate issue from the previous sentence. Yes, but what does "to be around" mean? Will catalogueoflife.org still be up in 2074? We don't know! But we can design systems where this doesn't even matter. What matters is that we can keep using the identifier and have an agreement of what it means. And you can do that with nanopublications and their ecosystem, and we are working on the concrete methods and tools. > I find it alarming that the link to the source of the statement that these two names are synonyms is not the DOI for the paper 10.3897/BDJ.12.e120304, No need to be alarmed. But yes, it should refer to the DOI and this should be fixed. We are looking into it with Pensoft. The reason is that this nanopublication was created before the DOI was minted. And the last step of making final versions of nanopublications upon formal article publication isn't fully developed yet. We have a long journey ahead of us, so we decided to move fast and allow ourselves to make mistakes on the way. This is one of them and it will be fixed. > The taxon names have as their identifiers https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/9880/taxon/3K9T4 and https://www.checklistbank.org/dataset/9880/taxon/3K9ST. These identifiers are also local to a particular dataset. Why not use identifiers such as the Catalogue of Life entries for these names (i.e., e.g. https://www.catalogueoflife.org/data/taxon/3K9T4, Checklistbank has broader coverage and is therefore more universal, and includes Catalogueoflife. To me Checklistbank seemed at least as persistent and long-term as Catalogueoflife, so overall preferable, but I am not familiar with the details and policies behind these platforms. In any case, this is a just a modeling decision we made, which we could have just as well done differently. It just shows we can use any kind of URI-based identifier, and consequently some tools/people will sometimes make modeling mistakes, but that's part of the process. > This is nice, but where is the equivalent for linking the publication to the nanopub via its DOI, or the taxon names to the nanopub? It should and can be there. See my answer above. > For example, http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/NOMEN_0000285 is used to define the relation between. I confess it’s unclear to me why NOMEN_0000285 isn’t used to directly link the two ChecklistBank records, rather than the indirection via #subjtaxon and #objtaxon, given that is a relationship between names (isn’t it?). See above. > It amazes me how readily people create new ontologies We just defined terms where needed, and didn't necessarily group them together in ontologies, applying the thinking of "breaking things into nano-pieces" to ontologies and their terms, in a sense. > especially as in the wider world there is a trend towards one vocabuary to rule them all (schema.org). Not all trends are good. Just saying :) > I find it disheartening that the bulk of the information in a nanopub is administrivia about that nanopub. Again, it all has a purpose, which I can explain in more detail if you like. > I understand the desire to establish provenance and to cryptographically sign the information, but all this is of limited use if the actual scientific information is poorly expressed. This is a false dichotomy. Of course we want both: provenance/validity, as well as properly expressed assertions. Nanopublications don't tell you upfront which ontologies to use (so no conceptual silo) or how to formulate your statements, but then of course modeling mistakes can happen. There is no way to prevent that, but that doesn't mean the technology or the ecosystem is flawed. I hope these responses and clarifications are helpful. Tobias" assertion.
- comment-6484057602 comment "Except possibly some details on the order in which certain steps should be taken. We have focussed on the technology (but always with the users in the longer term in our mind), because the technology needs to be at a certain level of maturity to start doing actual things with it. How to represent scientific content as a knowledge graph has been studied academically, and to make the next step to move this to practice we need a suitable technology first. And now that the technology is "ready enough", we can start doing this, but we won't get it right on the first try. So, in my view, what you point out are valid points, but they are not fundamental shortcomings but rather practical mistakes and rough edges that are part of the process. Right, the last two query links were broken. Somehow they got truncated. I fixed the links in my post above, and now they should work. Indeed persistence isn't free. But for nanopublications, as long as we stay in the range of thousands to millions, the costs are actually small. In particular if we separate the storage/archiving from the querying layer, as we do, where only the first is crucial for persistence. Then the persistence is more of an organizational/coordination problem than a cost problem, and with a decentralized redunant network as we have it, this task can be distributed and managed at low cost (on university servers, for example). Maybe URIs don't always resolve, but there is always a well-defined procedure to find the nanopubs at other locations. Things change if we talk about hundreds of millions to billions of nanopublications and more. Given the versatility of nanopublications, it's possible we will get there. For this we need a model where the mass creators of nanopublications also carry the associated costs. We are working on next-generation nanopublication services that will allow for exactly that. Nodes in the nanopublication network can then assert restrictions and quotas on users and types of nanopublications they replicate/accept, and so for publishing large quantities one would have to convince (with money, probably) a few of the nodes to co-host the nanopublications. Just as a quick summary of these plans; happy to explain more. And it's great that your post has triggered these discussions. Thanks for that :)" assertion.
- comment-6484057602 comment "Thanks for your reply. Yes, we seem to be in agreement then :) Except possibly some details on the order in which certain steps should be taken. We have focussed on the technology (but always with the users in the longer term in our mind), because the technology needs to be at a certain level of maturity to start doing actual things with it. How to represent scientific content as a knowledge graph has been studied academically, and to make the next step to move this to practice we need a suitable technology first. And now that the technology is "ready enough", we can start doing this, but we won't get it right on the first try. So, in my view, what you point out are valid points, but they are not fundamental shortcomings but rather practical mistakes and rough edges that are part of the process. Right, the last two query links were broken. Somehow they got truncated. I fixed the links in my post above, and now they should work. Indeed persistence isn't free. But for nanopublications, as long as we stay in the range of thousands to millions, the costs are actually small. In particular if we separate the storage/archiving from the querying layer, as we do, where only the first is crucial for persistence. Then the persistence is more of an organizational/coordination problem than a cost problem, and with a decentralized redunant network as we have it, this task can be distributed and managed at low cost (on university servers, for example). Maybe URIs don't always resolve, but there is always a well-defined procedure to find the nanopubs at other locations. Things change if we talk about hundreds of millions to billions of nanopublications and more. Given the versatility of nanopublications, it's possible we will get there. For this we need a model where the mass creators of nanopublications also carry the associated costs. We are working on next-generation nanopublication services that will allow for exactly that. Nodes in the nanopublication network can then assert restrictions and quotas on users and types of nanopublications they replicate/accept, and so for publishing large quantities one would have to convince (with money, probably) a few of the nodes to co-host the nanopublications. Just as a quick summary of these plans; happy to explain more. And it's great that your post has triggered these discussions. Thanks for that :)" assertion.
- comment-6484057602 comment "Thanks for your reply. Yes, we seem to be in agreement then :) Except possibly some details on the order in which certain steps should be taken. We have focussed on the technology (but always with the users in the longer term in our mind), because the technology needs to be at a certain level of maturity to start doing actual things with it. How to represent scientific content as a knowledge graph has been studied academically, and to make the next step to move this to practice we need a suitable technology first. And now that the technology is "ready enough", we can start doing this, but we won't get it right on the first try. So, in my view, what you point out are valid points, but they are not fundamental shortcomings but rather practical mistakes and rough edges that are part of the process. Right, the last two query links were broken. Somehow they got truncated. I fixed the links in my post above, and now they should work. Indeed persistence isn't free. But for nanopublications, as long as we stay in the range of thousands to millions, the costs are actually small. In particular if we separate the storage/archiving from the querying layer, as we do, where only the first is crucial for persistence. Then the persistence is more of an organizational/coordination problem than a cost problem, and with a decentralized redundant network as we have it, this task can be distributed and managed at low cost (on university servers, for example). Maybe URIs don't always resolve, but there is always a well-defined procedure to find the nanopubs at other locations. Things change if we talk about hundreds of millions to billions of nanopublications and more. Given the versatility of nanopublications, it's possible we will get there. For this we need a model where the mass creators of nanopublications also carry the associated costs. We are working on next-generation nanopublication services that will allow for exactly that. Nodes in the nanopublication network can then assert restrictions and quotas on users and types of nanopublications they replicate/accept, and so for publishing large quantities one would have to convince (with money, probably) a few of the nodes to co-host the nanopublications. Just as a quick summary of these plans; happy to explain more. And it's great that your post has triggered these discussions. Thanks for that :)" assertion.
- OpenAIRE comment "OpenAIRE AMKE is a non-profit organization with a mission to promote open scholarship and improve discoverability, accessibility, shareability, reusability, reproducibility, and monitoring of data-driven research results, globally. The organization operates a European e-infrastructure offering a diverse set of public services to accelerate the adoption of Open Science and is supported by a network of experts placed in key national organizations across European countries, the National Open Access Desks. The users of OpenAIRE services include researchers, research communities, policy makers, research-intensive organizations, SMEs, universities, libraries, and citizen scientists. OpenAIRE is a key implementer of the European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)." assertion.
- OpenAIRE-Guidelines-for-Literature-Managers-v4 comment "The OpenAIRE Guidelines for Literature Repository Managers 4.0 provide orientation for repository managers to define and implement their local data management policies according to the requirements of the OpenAIRE - Open Access Infrastructure for Research in Europe." assertion.
- OpenEdition-OAI-PMH comment "OpenEdition OAI-PMH Repository provides metadata on all documents published on OpenEdition." assertion.
- assertion comment "Language models != world models "Probing Multimodal LLMs as World Models for Driving" https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.05956" assertion.
- isidore comment "ISIDORE is a search engine providing access to digital data from the Humanities and Social Sciences (SSH). Open to all and in particular to teachers, researchers, PhD students and students, it is based on the principles of Linked Data and provides open access to data." assertion.
- COAR comment "COAR is an international association that brings together individual repositories and repository networks in order to build capacity, align policies and practices, and act as a global voice for the repository community." assertion.
- coar-resource-types comment "The Resource Type vocabulary defines concepts to identify the genre of a resource. Such resources, like publications, research data, audio and video objects, are typically deposited in institutional and thematic repositories or published in ejournals. This vocabulary supports a hierarchical model that relates narrower and broader concepts. Multilingual labels regard regional distinctions in language and term. Concepts of this vocabulary are mapped with terms and concepts of similar vocabularies and dictionaries." assertion.
- coara-access-rights comment "The Access Rights vocabulary defines concepts to declare the access status of a resource. Multilingual labels regard regional distinctions in language and term." assertion.
- openedition comment "OpenEdition is a comprehensive digital infrastructure for academic communication in the humanities and social sciences. It brings together four complementary platforms focused respectively on journals (OpenEdition Journals), book series (OpenEdition Books), research blogs (Hypotheses) and academic events (Calenda). With its status as a national research infrastructure, OpenEdition is supported by OpenEdition Center, a CNRS Support and Research Unit (UAR 2504) associated with Aix-Marseille University, the EHESS and Avignon University. Its missions: The development of open access digital publishing ; The dissemination of uses and skills related to digital publishing; Research and innovation around the methods of showcasing and searching for information entailed by digital technology; Guaranteeing a high level of reliability and availability across the platforms. OpenEdition is part of the French National Plan for Open Science." assertion.
- HumanID comment "HUMANID is the IR* Huma-Num centralized authentication service for Web services. It enables single-account access to NAKALA and other certain Web services. It can be coupled with IDHAL, ORCID, etc. " assertion.
- FAIR-EuMon comment "FAIR-EuMon metadata schema was built to FAIRly describe European biodiversity monitoring schemes across marine, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems" assertion.
- FAIR-EuMon comment "FAIR-EuMon metadata schema was built to FAIRly describe European biodiversity monitoring schemes across marine, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems" assertion.
- FAIR-EuMon comment "FAIR-EuMon metadata schema was built to FAIRly describe European biodiversity monitoring schemes across marine, terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems" assertion.
- GGP-Data-Catalog comment "The Generations and Gender Survey collects detailed microdata on life-course and family dynamics across countries. It captures individual-level information on significant life events such as leaving home, forming relationships, parenthood, and various life challenges. In the GGP Data Catalog you can access an extensive collection of datasets curated by the GGP, including the Generations and Gender Survey, Harmonized Histories, and Family and Fertility survey. Additionally, links to further documentation are provided to assist researchers in their analysis. The GGP data is available freely for non-commercial purposes." assertion.
- GGP comment "The Generations & Gender Programme Research Infrastructure provides scientists and policy makers with high quality and timely data about families and life course trajectories of individuals to enable researchers to contribute insights and answers to current societal and public policy challenges. The GGP provides users with an open-access data source of cross-nationally comparative surveys and contextual data. The GGP survey focuses on inter-generational and gender relations between people, expressed in care arrangements and the organization of paid and unpaid work. These features significantly improve the knowledge base for social science and policy-making in Europe and other developed countries. Crucial to understanding behaviours across the life course is the longitudinal panel design of the GGP surveys. The contextual database provides information on variations in context over time through more than 100 indicators from 60 countries in multiple regions as these are believed to have an impact on relationships between genders and generations." assertion.
- DDI-XML comment "Surveys designed in Colectica Questionnaires are represented in DDI 3.2. DDI is a data documentation standard used by national statistical organizations, long-running longitudinal studies, data archives, and others. Files of DDI 3.2 XML can be generated from the interface of the Colectica Questionnaires." assertion.
- ISCED comment "International Standard Classification of Education (ISCED) is the reference international classification for organising education programmes and related qualifications by levels and fields. ISCED 2011 (levels of education) has been implemented in all EU data collections since 2014. ISCED-F 2013 (fields of education and training) has been implemented since 2016. It is maintained by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO)." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "While I cannot judge the validity of the content, this assertion has a good structure and seems well-modeled." assertion.
- assertion comment "Enjoyed the opening of the Trusted Seed Unconference today. Great chats about using collaborative fiction to prototype future scenarios, building reputation systems in web3 and creating data commons and decentralized AI with @parrachia @MontyMerlin @YineisyMota and more! https://twitter.com/TrustedSeed/status/1668915242565246976" assertion.
- HSLeiden comment "Opleiding tot Informatica" assertion.
- resource comment "Soxhlet extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and lipid normalisation (wet weight cct/lipid proportion)" assertion.
- resource comment "Soxhlet extraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and lipid normalisation (wet weight cct/lipid proportion)" assertion.
- assertion comment "This is the best summary of the roadmap of AI agents I’ve seen: https://twitter.com/iwasrobbed/status/1718635164648063482" assertion.
- Getuigenverhalen comment "Getuigenverhalen is a website that keeps the stories and personal testimonies about the Second World War." assertion.
- assertion comment "Vibes after the debate https://twitter.com/remusofmars/status/1788935069731594527/video/1 " assertion.
- assertion comment "It can be that the way LLMs gain "control over us" is gradual and confusing, instead of a master attack using bioweapons. Once everything depends on them, "they" will effectively be in control, but the LLMs won't "know" they are "in charge". And yet, also us won't be able to directly control them. " assertion.
- assertion comment "It can be that the way LLMs gain "control over us" is gradual and confusing, instead of a master attack using bioweapons. Once everything depends on them, "they" will effectively be in control, but the LLMs won't "know" they are "in charge". And yet, also us won't be able to directly control them. " assertion.
- assertion comment "It can be that the way LLMs gain "control over us" is gradual and confusing, instead of a master attack using bioweapons. Once everything depends on them, "they" will effectively be in control, but the LLMs won't "know" they are "in charge". And yet, also us won't be able to directly control them. " assertion.
- assertion comment "I wonder if it's a good idea to focus the design of a product on power users who are already ideologically excited about it. On one side you have an early niche from which to learn from. On the other hand, you risk not solving a real problem for them and usage might vanish together with the initial excitement. " assertion.
- assertion comment "#VídeoPredicció 🌼 Ambient plenament primaveral 📷 Cada dia un raig... o més d'un 📷En Jordi t'ho explica: 📷Translate post https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IUsrsHEiYZU&feature=youtu.be&themeRefresh=1 " assertion.