Matches in Nanopublications for { ?s <https://w3id.org/linkflows/reviews/hasCommentText> ?o ?g. }
- comment hasCommentText "no change required" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "made changes" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "agreed. nothing to change" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "my pleasure!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Looking at this again, I think this formalization can be made more precise (and in a way simpler) by not using the universal context, but instead biodiversity data (Q28946370) as context and data reuse (Q58023280) as object." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "updated to reflect ecm binding as a property of the cancer cell" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "class updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Publication link included" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Ignored according to Cristina's recommendation" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "There is now!" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes! I am quite clever." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Class updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Provenance updated" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Thank you for your suggestion, which was addressed." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "In another review comment (http://purl.org/np/RALWxVELKuqrkcO9ud2eXr0E2-ot5bl-0NpOIQi1ktrgI) it is specified that this naming is ok." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText ""autosomal recessive disorder" has been added as "genetic disorder" to declare the context of the assertion" assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I adressed the good point made by the reviewer following his suggestion: mint a new class 'dysfunction of ERAD pathway' and then use this class in object position." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree that the object 'ERAD pathway' is not the appropiate. I addressed this minting a new class 'dysfunction of ERAD pathway' which is more accurate." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I changed the context with the more specific class 'genetic disorder' that is stated in the assertion but was not included in the first version, which is 'autosomal recessive disorder' thus declaring the congenital characteristic of this disorder." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree and I changed the provenance using the 'Generated by a formalization activity' template following reviewer's suggestion." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I agree and I changed the provenance using the 'Generated by a formalization activity' template accordingly." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "We thank the reviewer for this comment and have changed the formalization accordingly." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, it would be useful to specify how the sources should be referred to." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "We have adapted the formalization accordingly." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and maybe we should clarify the procedure for doing this systematically." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and it would be nice to have a way to assess how well the formalization corresponds to the original claim." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and we have also added the full stop at the end." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Yes, and as expressed in http://purl.org/np/RAANP7AWgyZRaS2WgNcGDfp8-4bXv0blhKapMcUrrWvos , it would be nice to have a way to quantify the solidity." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "I think the article is relevant for the (intended) audience of FAIR Connect. It is well-written and mostly clear, although some concepts may be expanded, as they are not straightforward for data stewards at the beginning of their career. As also suggested by the other reviewer, it could be useful to add a section reporting more practical examples. I also added some comments in the text and edited the text where I felt necessary, but please feel free to ignore changes if I misunderstood." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "Nice article on a really nice, relevant topic. Here and there the structure/argument could be strengthened a bit, I made some suggestions for that (please ignore if not useful). Not sure how/if you can use it, but at Radboud uni (my previous jobs), we actually started DMPs that reflect this process, not so much with regard to FAIR but regarding what the researcher is expected to do according to the RDM policy of his/her faculty. The DMP included pre-given answers but with blank spots for details and indeed room to deviate if explained. If you are curious, I can bring you into contact with my Radboud uni successor to explore." assertion.
- comment hasCommentText "This is just a test with a long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long long comment." assertion.